Should species that are endangered due to natural causes receive funding to protect them?

60% (631 votes)
Yes, funding should be set aside for all endangered species, even if they are endangered due to natural causes. (Why?)
18% (188 votes)
No, funding should not be used for saving species that are endangered due to natural causes. (Why not?)
23% (239 votes)
It depends. (Explain.)
Total votes: 1058

Your Comments, Thoughts, Questions, Ideas

Anonymous says:

i think that the animals should be protected because there is no other aniimals that are like it they are rare to find in the world like eagles they were indangered at one time but they mated and they had more kid egals\r\n

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 2:25pm
Anonymous says:

Because i think that animals are cute!!!

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 12:00pm
Anonymous says:

Yes, because there are so many species endangered due to human action that we have to take every action to protect and nuture biodiversity.

posted on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 1:54pm
Charlie The Cow says:

YOu know it, man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on Sun, 03/19/2006 - 6:46pm
Anonymous says:

yes

posted on Wed, 03/22/2006 - 10:38am
Anonymous says:

I think animals should not get killed for fun. You know it!

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 1:39pm
Anonymous says:

There is always a definate need for just causes. Despite the claim that species are indanger by natural cuases. There is always a depending variable which could be noted by human intervention. We are called not to just protect what we acknowledge to be our own fault, but also the faults we deny and appear to be not of our own direct cuase.

It is highly likely that many of these instances of so called natural cuases are infact linked to many other series of events which could have been backed by human intervention.

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 7:36pm
Anonymous says:

Maybe. Natural causes are just things that happen, and we can't stop the world from doing its thing. For instance, if the sun shines too bright, no one can stop that. But we could raise funds to give species endangered by light shelter.

posted on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 6:50pm
Anonymous says:

iwould rather have rats than snakes becuse snakes are gross and ther slimey

posted on Fri, 03/17/2006 - 12:06pm
Inquiring Mind says:

Throughout the ages, animals have gone extinct. Every species will someday become extinct. If animals are going extinct naturally, without human interference, why should humans try to put valuable resources into saving them when so many other problems that are caused by humans could be addressed with those scarce resources?

posted on Sat, 03/18/2006 - 12:59pm
Anonymous says:

Excuse you?!I agree that we can't do nothin to stop natural events that endanger many species but we can do something to help...just because they're becoming extinct without human intergerence doesn't mean humans can't interfer to help them survive a while longer

posted on Tue, 04/25/2006 - 10:16am
Anonymous says:

Even if the animal is dangerous it should still get help. shouldn't it? I mean if your dog bit someone it is considered a dangerous animal. does that mean it shouldn't be helped if it was hit by a car? All animals are dangerous in their own way. they shoudn't be punised for their instinces.

posted on Fri, 03/17/2006 - 1:55pm
Anonymous says:

I think to preserve our culture and enviornment we need to have funding for all species especially endangered ones to ensure their survival for the upcoming generations

posted on Sat, 03/18/2006 - 6:16pm
Anonymous says:

but they're raised to be eaten. it would be different if people didn't raise them for that purpose

posted on Fri, 03/17/2006 - 1:59pm
Anonymous says:

the thing w/ cows,chicken,etc. is that they reproduce much faster so we can eat & kill them. but most animals are dying quiker than they can reproduce! duh

posted on Mon, 03/20/2006 - 5:46pm
Clint says:

Not if they are endangered by natural causes, we should just leave them alone.

posted on Sat, 03/18/2006 - 4:42pm
<em>Liza</em>'s picture
Liza says:

How do you define "natural causes"? And how do you keep "natural causes" separate from "human causes" (or whatever you'd call whatever isn't "natural causes")?

posted on Sat, 03/18/2006 - 5:15pm
Ben (15 years old) says:

I can see why some people would say, "Why give the animals funding if the cause is natural? If it is natural, then funding the animals might be a total waste because there might not be a whole lot we could change about mother nature. The fact is thet are still endangered and they need all the help they can get.
I read earlier about, instead of using the funding for ebdangered species, use the money for other things we require funding for, such as schooling because the school funding has steadily been droping, and it is effecting the youth of today greatly.
Its all how you look at it, in terms of where they money should go. All in all, we should just analize what we really need and distribute the money as evenly as possible.

posted on Sun, 03/19/2006 - 5:26pm
Anonymous says:

what kind of natural causes?

posted on Sun, 03/19/2006 - 6:35pm
Tyler Huse says:

yes, they are in need. people sometimes help you when you are in need why don't you help them? so that is what I think!

posted on Mon, 03/20/2006 - 11:39am
Anonymous says:

i agree with you all the way!!

posted on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 5:30pm
Anonymous says:

Just let them die because it is natutal selection, fools!

posted on Mon, 03/20/2006 - 11:50am
Anonymous says:

WhAt!!!??? they are animals but they should be treated with respect too! without them humans wouldn't be alive!!!

posted on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 5:29pm
Anonymous says:

I think that it depends because some animals are dangerous/pests.

posted on Mon, 03/20/2006 - 2:21pm
Anonymous says:

so? without animals we wouldn't be alive no matter what kind they are!

posted on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 5:31pm
<em>Gene</em>'s picture
Gene says:

Are you saying your answer would be different for animal species as opposed to plant species, fungus species, etc.? That's interesting -- can you explain why you feel that way?

posted on Wed, 03/22/2006 - 10:28am
Anonymous says:

I totally agree. i think it is horrible that animals are dying. Think if your dog,cat,ect. was ddying that is horrible.

posted on Tue, 03/28/2006 - 4:45pm
Anonymous says:

I have previously answered yes to this quetionier, however, I think the question was not clear enough to understand since it was Stated "species", I think it should be clearly mention as Animal, I selected the option one but on seeing the result, I think I will not choose that. The question in not clear.

by, Uzoma Elekwachi.

posted on Tue, 03/21/2006 - 7:50pm
Anonymous says:

I like nature so I pick YES.

posted on Wed, 03/22/2006 - 4:31pm
Anonymous says:

ya, but animals need protection and if we could like take some ( the andangered ones) like out of the woods for a while so that they can make more and then set them back cause i mean even if it will happend again if they can keep making more then it wouldn#t be andangered.

posted on Thu, 03/23/2006 - 7:58am
Anonymous says:

I think animals which are endangered for natural causes should not be made protected; they are already ecologically outmoded. To allow them to continue to exist in an unnatural environment wouldnot be fair. Also natural endangerment happens and happened before human involvementt. Human caused endangered animals, on the other hand, should be protected.

posted on Thu, 03/23/2006 - 12:32pm
Anonymous says:

All animals should be protected

posted on Thu, 03/23/2006 - 6:05pm
Anonymous says:

thank you for your concern

posted on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 11:31am
Anonymous says:

if any animal is endangered, we should help it. This is our world, and we should take care of it while we can. Someday, we may find a cure for diseases with the help of earths animals

posted on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 12:37pm
Anonymous says:

dude, Yeah! if they don't then over time humans will be extinct NeXt!!!

posted on Fri, 03/24/2006 - 5:25pm
Anonymous says:

i find it very important to save animals becuase I love animals

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 1:43pm
Anonymous says:

i think that the animals should be protected because there is no other aniimals that are like it they are rare to find in the world like eagles they were indangered at one time but they mated and they had more kid egals\r\n

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 2:25pm
Anonymous says:

animals are cool!!!

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 4:51pm
Anonymous says:

Animals rock\r\nAnonymous

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 4:53pm
Anonymous says:

Animals need to be cared for or else they'll die out

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 6:01pm
Anonymous says:

Because animals are also living breathing creatuers that God created and I don't think he created them just to be hunted, and eventualy be extinked!

FROM: Opinionated-Know-It-All!

posted on Sat, 03/25/2006 - 7:45pm
Anonymous says:

Hi this is Frieda and Friedo. We support the National Organization for Endangered Species. We love animals! we feel sorry for animals who are dying. we think they hould stop that.

posted on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 2:58pm
Anonymous says:

i would save the animal if it doesn't vote republican.

posted on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 3:52pm
Anonymous says:

must do the cost/benefit analysis.

posted on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 4:07pm
Anonymous says:

I think all animals should be helped by others because their becoming extinkt and we have to stop that from happening because if we don't than pretty soon there won't be any animals left!\r\n\r\n from marcy

posted on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 4:11pm
Anonymous says:

aninmlas rox and they need help and protection

posted on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 4:29pm
Anonymous says:

Let nature take its corse

posted on Sun, 03/26/2006 - 8:05pm
Anonymous says:

with out misqutoes we would be alive wouldn't we?

posted on Tue, 03/28/2006 - 10:48am
Anonymous says:

No,
Many times when we try to help one situation we end up hurting another. The world is too complex. We do not understand everything.

posted on Tue, 03/28/2006 - 2:03pm
Anonymous says:

although i feel we should worrry aabout endangered animals, i am more worried about the millions of homeless, starving, and disease infected children. Thats what there should be a poll for!!!!!!!!!!

posted on Tue, 03/28/2006 - 3:12pm