Tasty, but possibly dangerous

Tasty, but possibly dangerous

The US government has banned or limited lead in consumer products—like children’s jewelry or paint on toys—but toys made in other countries may not meet US safety standards. (Photo courtesy Tim Brown, via Flickr)

Please contact us if you have questions about the rights on this image.

Your Comments, Thoughts, Questions, Ideas

Anonymous says:

they should not have banned lead

posted on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 10:04am
<em>Liza</em>'s picture
Liza says:

Why not? We don't HAVE to use paints with lead, or make cheap jewelry with lead, or run cars with leaded gasoline. There are alternatives, and the consequences of lead exposure are devastating. Plus, it's not just toys that are involved. Back when we used leaded gasoline, we contaminated the soil enough that worried parents are still advised by the EPA to provide their children with sandboxes so they don't play in dirt. And we phased out leaded gasoline three decades ago! Lead paint in homes is still the single biggest source of exposure for both children and adults. And lead in the paint on children's toys or cheap jewelry is just adding insult to injury.

The government has banned all sorts of nasty stuff; why NOT lead?

posted on Thu, 10/04/2007 - 10:31am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <h3> <h4> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <object> <embed> <param>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options