A Science Museum of Minnesota Community

To Green or Not to Green?

by RSRuckdashel on Jan. 24th, 2008

In recent conversations with friends and family, I have encountered a number of people who "Don't Believe in Global Warming". This confuses me as it appears to be an established scientific fact that human activity is directly impacting environmental patterns and that the accumulation of greenhouse gases is increasing faster than the earth's natural processes can adapt. Why do people treat this as a "belief" versus a fact?

Your Comments, Thoughts, Questions, Ideas

<em>Thor</em>'s picture
Thor says:

Here's my 2 cents worth: As some of the champions of dealing with global climate change are from the political arena (i.e. Al Gore), there are those out there who see this as a political issue. Political issues always have two sides and if your political leanings are not the same as the progressives who work to raise awareness on this issue, you figure you must take the other side. It's also interesting that some of the conservative politicians who initially poo-pooed global warming are now coming around to "believing" the science involved on the issue.

posted on Thu, 01/24/2008 - 6:23pm
<em>Gene</em>'s picture
Gene says:

We have discussed global warming many times on this blog—a quick search will produce dozens of posts. Some of the more pertinent include:


Global warming skepticism


Storm continues over global warming


Global warming: the debate continues


Has global warming stopped?


Obviously, some new meaning of the word “consensus” with which I had not previously been familiar


Have you seen Al Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth”?


Dueling documentaries

You will find many of the arguments for and against man-made global warming laid out in these posts and their comments. (Warning: some of these threads contain actual instances of irony and sarcasm. Read with caution.)

Most global warming skeptics would refute the premise that

“it’s an established scientific fact that human activity is directly impacting environmental patterns and that the accumulation of greenhouse gases is increasing faster than the earth's natural processes can adapt”

by citing numerous scientific studies that draw other conclusions. Indeed, some of them are cited in the above posts. However, the skeptics’ argument can be easily boiled down to three basic points:

1) From 1980 to 1998, humans pumped tons of carbon into the atmosphere, and global temperatures went up.

2) From 1999 to 2007, humans pumped tons of carbon into the atmosphere, and global temperatures stayed the same.

3) From 1940 to 1975, humans pumped tons of carbon into the atmosphere, and global temperatures went down.

Many of us eagerly await the publication of a comprehensive theory which accounts for all this data.

posted on Thu, 01/24/2008 - 6:25pm
Anonymous says:

I consider it criminal negligence. MY grandchildren will be the ones impoverished by their ignorance. Granted if teachers were treated more like human beings by our government and science education were treated as vital this wouldn't happen. Does anyone remember when politics was about opinion? Such as federal versus state power and allocation of funding, etc? Now half of it is trying to convince ignorant congressmen that science is not a "belief" that you have "faith" in. Whether or not you believe in gravity doesn't change the fact that you fall down when you trip. Global warming has been pretty well understood since the 1960's. We have the money and the minds to fix it. But that is just not where money goes... Maybe there should be a max income law and people who make over a million dollars a year can't keep anything over that million. NO ONE NEEDS a million dollars. NO. ONE. So maybe Jessica Simpson and Tom Selleck and whoever else in Hollywood should stop buying Armani and start buying food for the hungry. Or pay HUGE taxes that can go to education and such. Anyway, don't hold individuals responsible for not believing in global warning when it's their representatives that do them the disservice of not making it an issue and taking the responsibility to educate themselves and their constituents about such a vital issue. And I have learned that being kind and patient and caring enough to explain it... people do come around. So educate yourself on these issues and when it comes up, ask them if they would just hear you out. I've actually converted Creationists to believers in science simply by answering each question as it came and making sure my understanding of radiometric dating and chemistry were deep enough that I could explain it in my own words. My fiance just convinced a man of global warming the other day. Well, the guy said it made sense and that he would think about it. But considering he was belligerently shouting that global warming is a scam maybe ten minutes earlier, that's wonderful. And anyway, who wants a person to just believe you? What we want MOST is for them to listen, think, and then look into it themselves. That's thinking, and it's good for you.

posted on Fri, 02/08/2008 - 7:48pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <h3> <h4> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <object> <embed> <param>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options